Celebrity Big Brother is oh-so different from Big Brother
Monday, January 25th, 2010
Celebrity Big Brother has been the surprise hit of 2010, delivering far better ratings than were to be expected from what many see as a very tired format limping its way out of the limelight. When Channel 4 announced last year that Big Brother was to be no more, few were surprised. The racism row had totally undermined the celeb version and the “normal” (as in “other non-celebrity)” version was a freak show with weird and not very interesting people.
So, many people stopped watching.
The tabloids scaled down their coverage and the format was officially given one more year to live. It is unlikely that the “other” version’s last series will be a winner as, apart from being set in the same house and having evictions, there is a massive difference between the celeb version and its non-celeb counterpart.
The rise of celebrities and celebrity continues year on year, seemingly indefinitely. Many people are fascinated by each nuance of celebrities’ lives, most of which are kept well hidden and rely on speculation, conjecture, and – more often than not – total fabrication. The beauty of Celeb Big Bro is that many nuances are not hidden – hence the audience gets a lot out of it. They see what celebs are really like – or think they do. It therefore informs their lives beyond Celeb Big Brother the programme in much the same way as “I’m a Celebrity, Get Me Out Of Here” does.
If I was at Channel 4, I would keep the format and just do the Celeb version. They might even do two series a year? Although part of the reason for its success is probably the January time slot, when people are in various forms of hibernation /depression.
It just goes to show that two things that at first sight look very similar, aren’t in fact very similar at all, which is what everyone in brand and marketing knew all along.
